Capital Controls: A Cure Worse than the Problem?
117 Pages Posted: 16 Feb 2005
Abstract
Free capital movements played an important part in the economic integration and globalization of the nineteenth century. By the end of that century, capital flows were on a remarkable scale.
The modern use of capital controls dates back to the 1930s. In this paper, the author analyzes historical experience with capital controls, in Britain and elsewhere, and reviews the theory. He concludes that such controls are damaging and that there is no case for reviving them, as some economists have suggested and as anti-globalizers would wish. Capital mobility improves the worldwide allocation of resources, channelling resources to their most productive uses. Controls on capital movements result in deadweight losses and bureaucratic costs. They are difficult to remove and they damage the credibility of the government's commitment to a market economy.
Keywords: Capital, globalization, gold standard, Breton Woods, investment
JEL Classification: E22, E42
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
Financial Globalization: A Reappraisal
By M. Ayhan Kose, Eswar S. Prasad, ...
-
Financial Globalization: A Reappraisal
By M. Ayhan Kose, Eswar S. Prasad, ...
-
Financial Globalization: A Reappraisal
By M. Ayhan Kose, Eswar S. Prasad, ...
-
Economic Effects and Structural Determinants of Capital Controls
-
What Matters for Financial Development? Capital Controls, Institutions, and Interactions
By Menzie David Chinn and Hiro Ito
-
What Matters for Financial Development? Capital Controls, Institutions, and Interactions
By Menzie David Chinn and Hiro Ito
-
Short-Run Pain, Long-Run Gain: The Effects of Financial Liberalization
-
Short-Run Pain, Long-Run Gain: The Effects of Financial Liberalization
-
Short-Run Pain, Long-Run Gain: The Effects of Financial Liberalization