Incentives for Developing and Communicating Principles: A Reply
Interfaces, Vol. 33, No. 8, pp. 109-111
6 Pages Posted: 17 Feb 2005 Last revised: 16 Jul 2008
Abstract
The commentators raised many interesting ideas in response to Armstrong and Pagell (2003), from which one general theme emerges: The commentators claim that management science lacks the incentives to encourage efforts to develop and communicate grounded principles. As a result, academics often conduct their research as an intellectual exercise with little concern as to whether their findings might eventually be of any practical use.
Keywords: Communication, management science, management, academics
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
Peer Review for Journals: Evidence on Quality Control, Fairness, and Innovation
-
Does the Need for Agreement Among Reviewers Inhibit the Publication of Controversial Findings?
-
Management Folklore and Management Science - on Portfolio Planning, Escalation Bias, and Such
-
Last Writes? Re-Assessing the Law Review in the Age of Cyberspace
-
Yesterday Once More: Skeptics, Scribes and the Demise of Law Reviews
-
Editorial Policies for the Publication of Controversial Findings
-
Factors Influencing Academic Research Productivity: A Survey of Management Scientists
-
Publishing Standards for Research in Forecasting (Editorial)