Using Mean Reversion as a Measure of Persistence
56 Pages Posted: 6 May 2005
Date Written: March 2005
Abstract
This paper elaborates on the alternative measure of persistence recently suggested in Marques (2004), which is based on the idea of mean reversion. A formal distinction between the "unconditional probability of a given process not crossing its mean in period t" and its estimator, is made clear and the relationship between this new measure and the widely used "sum of the autoregressive coefficients", as alternative measures of persistence, is investigated. Using the law of large numbers and the central limit theorem, properties for the estimator of the new measure of persistence are established, which allow tests of hypotheses to be performed, under very general conditions. Finally, some Monte Carlo experiments are conducted in order to compare the finite sample properties of the estimator for the "unconditional probability of a given process not crossing its mean in period t" and the OLS estimator for the "sum of the autoregressive coefficients".
Keywords: Inflation persistence; mean reversion, non-parametric estimator
JEL Classification: E31, C22, E52
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
Efficient Tests for an Autoregressive Unit Root
By Graham Elliott, Thomas J. Rothenberg, ...
-
By James H. Stock and Mark W. Watson
-
The Time-Varying NAIRU and its Implications for Economic Policy
-
Evidence on Structural Instability in Macroeconomic Time Series Relations
By James H. Stock and Mark W. Watson
-
How Precise are Estimates of the Natural Rate of Unemployment?
By Douglas Staiger, James H. Stock, ...
-
Is There a Role for Monetary Aggregates in the Conduct of Monetary Policy?
-
Confidence Intervals for the Largest Autoresgressive Root in U.S. Macroeconomic Time Series
-
What's Happened to the Phillips Curve?
By Flint Brayton, John M. Roberts, ...
-
By Victor Zarnowitz and Phillip A. Braun
-
Price Inertia and Policy Ineffectiveness in the United States, 1890-1980