Evolution of Rules in a Common Law System: Differential Litigation of the Fee Tail and Other Perpetuities
25 Pages Posted: 18 Feb 2005 Last revised: 7 Jun 2013
Abstract
This paper presents a variation on the Rubin-Priest theory of the evolution of common law rules toward efficiency. It offers the fee tail and similar restraints on alienation as examples of how inefficient rules can lead to inefficient uses of land, which cause owners to seek the help of courts in freeing their lands from the inefficient constraints. In other words, there is a feedback loop that provides courts with opportunities to overturn inefficient common law rules. We should expect this common law drift toward efficiency to be stronger for property rules than for tort rules. Because efficient property rules are important to a healthy economy, the common law process may have an internal advantage in its external competition with other legal systems.
Keywords: evolution, fee tail, perpetuities, common law, property
JEL Classification: K11, K41, K10
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
Litigation and the Evolution of Legal Remedies: A Dynamic Model
By Vincy Fon and Francesco Parisi
-
The Rise and Fall of Efficiency in the Common Law: A Supply-Side Analysis
-
Litigation, Judicial Path-Dependence, and Legal Change
By Vincy Fon, Francesco Parisi, ...
-
Judicial Precedents in Civil Law Systems: A Dynamic Analysis
By Vincy Fon and Francesco Parisi
-
Litigation and Legal Evolution: Does Procedure Matter?
By Barbara Luppi and Francesco Parisi
-
Quantitative Methods in Comparative Law
By Francesco Parisi and Barbara Luppi