Organizational Process Models of Budgeting
46 Pages Posted: 22 Feb 2005
Date Written: December 1, 2002
Abstract
There are several reasons for the obscurity of the organizational process model. Perhaps the most important is the widespread acceptance of the standard economic model, which holds that spending outcomes are determined by the supply of and the demand for publicly provided goods and services and that competition somehow constrains elected officials to serve the tastes and preferences of the median voter. The best way to define the organizational process model is to follow its interesting etiology across time and academic boundaries, focusing on the work of Herbert Simon, Aaron Wildavsky. John Padgett, John Patrick Crecine, and P.D. Larkey. We divide the development of the organizational process model into four distinct phases: pronouncement, formalization, differentiation, and diffusion, look in turn at each of these phases, and conclude that the time has come for scholars to revisit the model, exploring its potential for contributing not only to formal budget theory but also to other fields of public policy and management as well.
Keywords: Budget, satisficing, organizational process, mechanisms
JEL Classification: B25, H61
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
Distributive Politics and Economic Growth
By Alberto F. Alesina and Dani Rodrik
-
Is Inequality Harmful for Growth? Theory and Evidence
By Torsten Persson and Guido Tabellini
-
Why Did the West Extend the Franchise? Inequality and Growth in Historical Perspective
By Daron Acemoglu and James A. Robinson