Contemporary Issues in Law, Vol. 7, pp. 100-118, 2004
Posted: 24 Feb 2005
This paper reports qualitative and quantitative data from a study of 'choice' between contemplating the use (but ultimately not invoking) law to coerce treatment of severe anorexia nervosa (AN) patients as against actually obtaining coercive orders, along with data regarding subsequent choices made between adult guardianship and mental health (and other) avenues of legal coercion. The strategic option of lodging an application for an order, which is then withdrawn before hearing, is also examined, along with the nature of the tribunal hearings when applications proceed. All of these settings are shown to yield rich material for a Therapeutic Jurisprudence analysis.
Keywords: Anorexia, regulation, treatment, therapeutic jurisprudence
JEL Classification: I10, K10, K32
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Carney, Terry and Saunders, Dominique and Tait, David and Touyz, Stephen and Ingvarson, Miriam, Therapeutic Pathways in Treatment of Severe Anorexia Nervosa?. Contemporary Issues in Law, Vol. 7, pp. 100-118, 2004. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=671282