Ownership, Exit and Voice after Mass Privatization: Evidence from Mongolia
42 Pages Posted: 27 Mar 1998
There are 2 versions of this paper
Ownership, Exit and Voice after Mass Privatization: Evidence from Mongolia
Date Written: January 1998
Abstract
The success of mass privatization requires either that new owners are active in corporate affairs or that the original owners sell their shares to those who are willing to be active: voice or exit is necessary. We examine the structure of ownership and the extent of voice and exit in one transition country, Mongolia. We document the size of the ownership changes (through mergers, spin-offs, and stock sales) occurring since privatization and examine which owners are changing in importance. We evaluate corporate governance mechanisms, examining patterns of violations of company law and deviations from reasonable criteria for effective governance. We show that ownership changes and the quality of governance are correlated.
JEL Classification: P11, P21, O53, H70, H20
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
From State to Market: A Survey of Empirical Studies on Privatization
-
Enterprise Restructuring in Transition: A Quantitative Survey
By Simeon Djankov and Peter Murrell
-
Enterprise Restructuring in Transition: A Quantitative Survey
By Simeon Djankov and Peter Murrell
-
Russian Privatization and Corporate Governance: What Went Wrong?
By Bernard S. Black, Reinier Kraakman, ...
-
How Does Privatization Work? Evidence from the Russian Shops
By Nicholas Barberis, Maxim Boycko, ...
-
By Joseph P. H. Fan and T.j. Wong
-
By Enrico C. Perotti and Bruno Biais