The Costs of Being Public after Sarbanes-Oxley: The Irony of 'Going Private'
18 Pages Posted: 24 Feb 2005
There are 2 versions of this paper
The Costs of Being Public after Sarbanes-Oxley: The Irony of 'Going Private'
The Costs of Being Public after Sarbanes-Oxley: The Irony of 'Going Private'
Date Written: February 2005
Abstract
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 added numerous costs to the burden of being a public company. The most onerous of these, requiring inside and outside assessment of internal controls, is only now affecting the costs of remaining a public company. After reviewing the reports of increased compliance costs for larger companies, this paper reports on the increasing numbers of companies choosing to terminate reporting under the securities laws, and focuses on the costs reported for those (generally smaller) companies that disclose their actual compliance costs.
Keywords: Sarbanes-Oxley, Securities, Corporation, Regulation
JEL Classification: D23, G30, G38, K2, K22
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
Economic Consequences of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
By Ivy Zhang
-
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act and the Making of Quack Corporate Governance
-
Corporate Governance and Firm Value: the Impact of the 2002 Governance Rules
-
Market Reaction to Events Surrounding the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and Earnings Management
By Haidan Li, Morton Pincus, ...
-
Why Do Firms Go Dark? Causes and Economic Consequences of Voluntary SEC Deregistrations
By Christian Leuz, Alexander J. Triantis, ...
-
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act and Firms' Going-Private Decisions
By Ellen Engel, Rachel M. Hayes, ...
-
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and Security Market Behavior: Early Evidence
By Zabihollah Rezaee and Pankaj K. Jain