The Importance of Objectivity and Falsification in Management Science

Journal of Management, Vol. 9, pp. 213-216, 1983

3 Pages Posted: 11 Mar 2005 Last revised: 31 Dec 2011

See all articles by J. Scott Armstrong

J. Scott Armstrong

University of Pennsylvania - Marketing Department

Abstract

Arguments on the best way to do research should be subjected to empirical research. Much has already been learned from recent research. My conclusion from this research is that those who call for more subjectivity in scientific research or reporting are looking at a major shortcoming in scientific practice and are proclaiming it to be a virtue.

Keywords: Managment, management science, empirical research, subjectivity

Suggested Citation

Armstrong, J. Scott, The Importance of Objectivity and Falsification in Management Science. Journal of Management, Vol. 9, pp. 213-216, 1983, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=676084

J. Scott Armstrong (Contact Author)

University of Pennsylvania - Marketing Department ( email )

700 Jon M. Huntsman Hall
3730 Walnut Street
Philadelphia, PA 19104-6340
United States
215-898-5087 (Phone)
215-898-2534 (Fax)

HOME PAGE: http://marketing.wharton.upenn.edu/people/faculty/armstrong.cfm

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
96
Abstract Views
1,085
Rank
492,371
PlumX Metrics