Download This PaperIs Review by Peers as Fair as it Appears?
Interfaces, Vol. 12, pp. 62-74, October 1982
10 Pages Posted: 8 Mar 2005 Last revised: 26 Jul 2008
Abstract
Recent research shows that journal reviewing practices are neither objective nor fair. I propose a procedure to increase the likelihood of publishing important papers. This will be tested by Interfaces for a year.
Keywords: Peer reviews, management science, journal reviews
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
J. Scott Armstrong (Contact Author)
University of Pennsylvania - Marketing Department ( email )
700 Jon M. Huntsman Hall
3730 Walnut Street
Philadelphia, PA 19104-6340
United States
215-898-5087 (Phone)
215-898-2534 (Fax)
HOME PAGE: http://marketing.wharton.upenn.edu/people/faculty/armstrong.cfm
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
Peer Review for Journals: Evidence on Quality Control, Fairness, and Innovation
-
Does the Need for Agreement Among Reviewers Inhibit the Publication of Controversial Findings?
-
Management Folklore and Management Science - on Portfolio Planning, Escalation Bias, and Such
-
Last Writes? Re-Assessing the Law Review in the Age of Cyberspace
-
Yesterday Once More: Skeptics, Scribes and the Demise of Law Reviews
-
Incentives for Developing and Communicating Principles: A Reply
-
Editorial Policies for the Publication of Controversial Findings
-
Factors Influencing Academic Research Productivity: A Survey of Management Scientists
-
Publishing Standards for Research in Forecasting (Editorial)