Which is the More Predictable Gender? Public Good Contribution and Personality
34 Pages Posted: 18 Mar 2005
Date Written: March 1, 2005
Abstract
Personality questionnaires have been used and can be used to predict behavior in economic settings. Using two sets of state-of-the-art measures from personality psychology (the Big Six) and social psychology (Social Value Orientation), we find that the behavior of men is predictable in the first half of a public good contribution experiment, whereas that of women is not. This result agrees with the reinterpretation of Carol Gilligan's (1982) view that women are more sensitive to the context in which decisions are made.
Keywords: gender, context, personality, public goods
JEL Classification: J16, C91, H41
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
The Costs of Deception: Evidence from Psychology
By Andreas Ortmann and Ralph Hertwig
-
The Costs of Deception: Evidence from Psychology
By Andreas Ortmann and Ralph Hertwig
-
By John Duffy and Eric O'neill Fisher
-
Identifying Altruism in the Laboratory
By Glenn W. Harrison and Laurie Johnson
-
Correlated Equilibria, Good and Bad: An Experimental Study
By John Duffy and Nick Feltovich
-
Giving in Dictator Games: Regard for Others or Regard by Others?
-
To Deceive or Not to Deceive: The Effect of Deception on Behavior in Future Laboratory Experiments
By Julian C. Jamison, Dean S. Karlan, ...