Mutual Fund Competition with Misspecified Investment Objectives

24 Pages Posted: 18 Mar 2005

See all articles by Marco A. Navone

Marco A. Navone

Finance Discipline Group - UTS Business School; Bocconi University - CAREFIN - Centre for Applied Research in Finance; Financial Research Network (FIRN)

Date Written: June 17, 2003

Abstract

This paper studies the relation between past performance and fund flows into and out of mutual funds in the Italian market. Using monthly data on more than 800 funds divided in 23 investment categories I try to evaluate the length of the relevant evaluation period used by investors to measure the past performance of mutual funds, the level of competition between funds that operate in different investment categories and the likeliness between the behavior of gross investments (flows into mutual funds) and withdrawals (flows out of mutual funds). I find that investors evaluate fund performance on a very short time horizon (three months seems to be the relevant period), that the relevant performance measure is the position in the category ranking and not the return of the fund (the competition is segmented: funds do not compete across categories), that while fund inflows are related positively to past performance there is not any sensible relation between withdrawals and past performance.

Keywords: Mutual Funds, Investment Flows, Investment Objectives

JEL Classification: D14, G23

Suggested Citation

Navone, Marco A., Mutual Fund Competition with Misspecified Investment Objectives (June 17, 2003). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=677405 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.677405

Marco A. Navone (Contact Author)

Finance Discipline Group - UTS Business School ( email )

Haymarket
Sydney, NSW 2007
Australia

Bocconi University - CAREFIN - Centre for Applied Research in Finance

Via Sarfatti, 25
Milan, 20136
Italy

Financial Research Network (FIRN)

C/- University of Queensland Business School
St Lucia, 4071 Brisbane
Queensland
Australia

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
181
Abstract Views
1,249
rank
202,087
PlumX Metrics