Download this Paper Open PDF in Browser

Cardozo and Posner: A Study in Contracts

89 Pages Posted: 7 Mar 2005  

Lawrence A. Cunningham

George Washington University

Date Written: January 1995

Abstract

This article critically evaluates the major judicial opinions on the law of contracts written by Judges Benjamin N. Cardozo and Richard A. Posner. Respectively, these judges are the first and third most influential judges on the subject measured by the frequency with which contemporary contracts casebooks reproduce their opinions. Exploring dozens of classic opinions of these judicial titans, the piece contrasts the philosophies and methods the two judges employ in wrestling with many fundamental challenges in contract law, from formation to performance to damages. The inquiry suggests that, using Isaiah Berlin's nomenclature, Judge Cardozo is the fox of American contract law while Posner is its hedgehog. Judge Cardozo displayed the thickly-textured doctrinalist, an optimizer of competing objectives; Judge Posner is a maximizer. (Accompanying tables report data on the contributions of the 15 most influential judges contributing to contract law.)

Keywords: judicial reputation, contracts casebooks, Allegheny College, Lucy Lady Duff Gordon, DeCicco, Sun Printing, Lake River, Wisconsin Knife, Morin, Selmer, good faith, commercial certainty, intention, freedom of contract, liquidated damages

Suggested Citation

Cunningham, Lawrence A., Cardozo and Posner: A Study in Contracts (January 1995). William & Mary Law Review, Vol. 36, p. 1379. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=678761

Lawrence A. Cunningham (Contact Author)

George Washington University ( email )

2000 H Street, N.W.
Washington, DC 20052
United States
202-994-0732 (Phone)

Paper statistics

Downloads
929
Rank
19,682
Abstract Views
8,010