Earnings Management Choices When Stock-Option Incentives Conflict*
52 Pages Posted: 10 Apr 2005
Date Written: September 20, 2005
Abstract
Prior research suggests that managers use income-increasing (decreasing) accruals to increase the value of their stock option exercises (grants). I extend this research by modeling firms' accrual choices when incentives from stock options conflict and are confounded by other stock option features. I find that when incentives to maximize the values of option exercises (unvested options) and option grants (vested options) conflict, firms select accounting accruals to maximize the value of option exercises (unvested options). Surprisingly, despite the presence of vested options, firms use income-decreasing accruals in order to increase the value of option grants.
Keywords: Agency theory, stock options, earnings management, accruals
JEL Classification: G34, M41, M52
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
Are CEOS Really Paid Like Bureaucrats?
By Brian J. Hall and Jeffrey B. Liebman
-
Are CEOS Really Paid Like Bureaucrats?
By Brian J. Hall and Jeffrey B. Liebman
-
The Other Side of the Tradeoff: The Impact of Risk on Executive Compensation
-
Good Timing: CEO Stock Option Awards and Company News Announcements
-
Good Timing: CEO Stock Option Awards and Company News Announcements
-
The Use of Equity Grants to Manage Optimal Equity Incentive Levels
By John E. Core and Wayne R. Guay
-
The Other Side of the Tradeoff: the Impact of Risk on Executive Compensation
-
Stock Options for Undiversified Executives
By Brian J. Hall and Kevin J. Murphy