In Search of the Qualitative Clear Majority: Democratic Experimentalism and the Quebec Secession Reference

61 Pages Posted: 30 Mar 2005

See all articles by Cristie Ford

Cristie Ford

Peter A. Allard School of Law

Abstract

This article attempts to marry direct democratic deliberation with the enforcement of important constitutional norms in the context of a real-life policy question.

The question is the secession of Quebec from Canada. The article argues that a referendum is neither the most legitimate nor the most effective way to address the issue. The debate over Quebec's future must be reoriented by reference to the broad normative framework set out by the Supreme Court of Canada in the Reference Re Secession of Quebec, [1998] 2 S.C.R. 217, combined with a new democratic process. This article introduces an innovative constitutional model called democratic experimentalism, which seeks to ensure legitimacy, participation, and accountability within heterogenous, complex democratic systems, as a fresh perspective on Canada's troubled federalism debate.

The article concludes that democratic experimentalism is compatible with Canada's constitutional values and traditions, and with the standard of the clear qualitative majority vote set down by the Supreme Court of Canada. Equally, the Secession Reference approach contains within it an important new understanding of how pluralist democracies globally should approach fundamental constitutional questions.

Suggested Citation

Ford, Cristie L., In Search of the Qualitative Clear Majority: Democratic Experimentalism and the Quebec Secession Reference. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=688063

Cristie L. Ford (Contact Author)

Peter A. Allard School of Law ( email )

University of British Columbia
1822 East Mall
Vancouver, British Columbia V6T 1Z1
Canada

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
80
Abstract Views
1,428
rank
406,192
PlumX Metrics