Pricing Capital Under Mandatory Unbundling and Facilities Sharing
31 Pages Posted: 4 May 2005 Last revised: 4 Sep 2022
Date Written: March 2005
Abstract
The regulation of telecommunications, railroads, and other network industries has been based on mandatory unbundling and facilities sharing - entrants have the option to lease part or all of incumbents' facilities if and when they desire, at rates determined by regulators. This flexibility is of great value to entrants, but because investments are largely irreversible, it is costly to supply by incumbents. However, pricing formulas used by regulators to set lease rates for capital do not compensate incumbents for this flexibility, so that incumbents are effectively forced to subsidized entrants, discouraging further investments. This paper shows how pricing formulas used to set lease rates can be adjusted to account for the transfer of option value from incumbents to entrants, and estimates the average size of the adjustment for land-based local voice telecommunications in the U.S.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
Regulatory Failure: Time for a New Policy Paradigm
By James Alleman and Paul Rappoport
-
The End or the Means? The Pursuit of Competition in Regulated Telecommunications Markets
-
Unbundling and Facilities-Based Entry by Clecs: Two Empirical Tests
By George S. Ford and Michael Pelcovits
-
Irreversible Investment, Capital Costs and Productivity Growth: Implications for Telecommunications
-
Invest Today or Tomorrow? A Real Option Approach to Strategic Development in the French DSL Market
By Laurent Benzoni, Nicolas Gresser, ...
-
An Investment Criterion Incorporating Real Options
By Hirofumi Suto, James Alleman, ...