Legal History for a Dummy: A Comment on the Role of History in Judicial Interpretation of the Confrontation Clause

7 Pages Posted: 9 Apr 2005  

Peter Tillers

Yeshiva University - Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law

Multiple version iconThere are 2 versions of this paper

Date Written: 2005

Abstract

Judges can neither do good legal history nor recognize good legal history. Q.E.D.

Keywords: Confrontation Clause, Legal History, Misuse of Legal History

Suggested Citation

Tillers, Peter, Legal History for a Dummy: A Comment on the Role of History in Judicial Interpretation of the Confrontation Clause (2005). Cardozo Law Legal Studies Research Paper No. 110. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=693862 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.693862

Peter Tillers (Contact Author)

Yeshiva University - Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law ( email )

55 Fifth Ave.
New York, NY 10003
United States
212-790-0334 (Phone)
212-790-0205 (Fax)

Paper statistics

Downloads
241
Rank
82,774
Abstract Views
2,032