The Credibility of Self-Regulation: Evidence from the Accounting Profession's Peer Review Program

33 Pages Posted: 18 Apr 2005

See all articles by Clive S. Lennox

Clive S. Lennox

University of Southern California

Gilles Hilary

Georgetown University - Department of Accounting and Business Law

Multiple version iconThere are 2 versions of this paper

Date Written: March 4, 2005

Abstract

Following the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, self-regulated peer reviews at accounting firms were replaced by independent inspections conducted by the Public Company Accounting and Oversight Board. Critics of self-regulation had argued that the peer review program lacked credibility. This paper tests whether the opinions issued by the peer reviewers provided credible information to clients about audit firm quality. We find audit firms gained clients after receiving clean opinions from their reviewers and lost clients after receiving modified or adverse opinions. This suggests peer review opinions provided credible information about quality differences between audit firms.

Keywords: Self-regulation, Sarbanes-Oxley Act

JEL Classification: G18, G34, L51, M49, G38

Suggested Citation

Lennox, Clive and Hilary, Gilles, The Credibility of Self-Regulation: Evidence from the Accounting Profession's Peer Review Program (March 4, 2005). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=698701 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.698701

Clive Lennox (Contact Author)

University of Southern California ( email )

2250 Alcazar Street
Los Angeles, CA 90089
United States

Gilles Hilary

Georgetown University - Department of Accounting and Business Law ( email )

McDonough School of Business
Washington, DC 20057
United States

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
950
Abstract Views
8,805
Rank
49,830
PlumX Metrics