Download this Paper Open PDF in Browser

Unilateral Refusals to License in the U.S.

45 Pages Posted: 1 Jun 2005  

Herbert J. Hovenkamp

Univ. of Pennsylvania Law and Wharton Business

Mark D. Janis

Indiana University Maurer School of Law

Mark A. Lemley

Stanford Law School

Date Written: April 2005

Abstract

Most antitrust claims relating to intellectual property involve challenges to agreements, licensing practices or affirmative conduct involving the use or disposition of the intellectual property rights or the products they cover. But sometimes an antitrust claim centers on an intellectual property owner's refusal to use or license an intellectual property right, perhaps coupled with efforts to enforce the intellectual property right against infringers. The allegation may be that the intellectual property right is so essential to competition that it must be licensed across the board, or that a refusal to license it to one particular party was discriminatory, or that in context a refusal to license helped a monopolist to acquire or maintain market power.

Claims based on a unilateral refusal to license - the subject of this chapter - present important issues at the center of the tension between antitrust and intellectual property. The antitrust and intellectual property laws are not necessarily in conflict. For the most part they serve complementary goals, though each must limit the scope of the other. Unilateral refusal to license cases, however, cut to the heart of the intellectual property owner's right to exclude others from practicing the intellectual property. As such, efforts to invoke antitrust law in this context deserve special scrutiny.

Section 2 reviews the basic principles relating to unilateral refusals to license intellectual property rights. Section 3 discusses in detail the various sets of circumstances in which antitrust plaintiffs argue for exceptions to those basic rules. Section 4 distinguishes unilateral from concerted and conditional refusals to deal.

Suggested Citation

Hovenkamp, Herbert J. and Janis, Mark D. and Lemley, Mark A., Unilateral Refusals to License in the U.S. (April 2005). Stanford Law and Economics Olin Working Paper No. 303. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=703161 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.703161

Herbert J. Hovenkamp

Univ. of Pennsylvania Law and Wharton Business ( email )

3501 Sansom Street
Philadelphia, PA 19104
United States
319-512-9579 (Phone)

Mark David Janis

Indiana University Maurer School of Law ( email )

211 S. Indiana Avenue
Bloomington, IN 47405
United States

Mark A. Lemley (Contact Author)

Stanford Law School ( email )

559 Nathan Abbott Way
Stanford, CA 94305-8610
United States

Paper statistics

Downloads
958
Rank
18,757
Abstract Views
4,360