The Market for Criminal Justice: Federalism, Crime Control, and Jurisdictional Competition

63 Pages Posted: 21 Apr 2005

See all articles by Doron Teichman

Doron Teichman

Hebrew University of Jerusalem - Faculty of Law


For the most part, the United States has a decentralized criminal justice system. State legislatures define the majority of crimes and set out the punishments for those crimes. In addition, the enforcement of criminal laws lies, in most cases, in the hands of local law enforcement agencies. This article points out how this decentralized structure drives local jurisdictions to harshen their criminal justice system in order to displace crime to neighboring jurisdictions. More precisely, local jurisdictions can attempt to displace crime in two distinct ways. First, they can raise the expected sanction to a level that is higher than that in neighboring jurisdictions in order to become less attractive crime targets. Second, they can remove from them individuals who demonstrated that they have a high propensity to commit crimes. The article then turns to analyze the policy implications of the existence of jurisdictional competition in the area of criminal justice, and argues that the United States' criminal justice system might need a comprehensive structure reform that will regulate the competitive market for criminal justice.

Keywords: Federalism, criminal law, jurisdictional competition, law and economics

JEL Classification: K42

Suggested Citation

Teichman, Doron, The Market for Criminal Justice: Federalism, Crime Control, and Jurisdictional Competition. Michigan Law Review, 2005, U of Texas law, Law and Econ Research Paper No. 048, Available at SSRN:

Doron Teichman (Contact Author)

Hebrew University of Jerusalem - Faculty of Law ( email )

Mount Scopus
Mount Scopus, IL 91905

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
PlumX Metrics