Treatment Effect Bounds: An Application to Swan-Ganz Catheterization
50 Pages Posted: 25 May 2005 Last revised: 11 Apr 2022
Date Written: April 2005
Abstract
We reanalyze data from the observational study by Connors et al. (1996) on the impact of Swan-Ganz catheterization on mortality outcomes. The Connors et al. (1996) study assumes that there are no unobserved differences between patients who are catheterized and patients who are not catheterized and finds that catheterization increases patient mortality. We instead allow for such differences between patients by implementing both the bounds of Manski (1990), which only exploits an instrumental variable, and the bounds of Shaikh and Vytlacil (2004), which exploit mild nonparametric, structural assumptions in addition to an instrumental variable. We propose and justify the use of indicators of weekday admission as an instrument for catheterization in this context. We find that in our application, the Manski (1990) bounds do not indicate whether catheterization increases or decreases mortality, whereas the Shaikh and Vytlacil (2004) bounds reveal that catheterization increases mortality at 30 days and beyond. We also extend the analysis of Shaikh and Vytlacil (2004) to exploit a further nonparametric, structural assumption -- that doctors catheterize individuals with systematically worse latent health -- and find that this assumption further narrows these bounds and strengthens our conclusions.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
Identification and Estimation of Local Average Treatment Effects
By Joshua D. Angrist and Guido W. Imbens
-
Estimating the Return to Schooling: Progress on Some Persistent Econometric Problems
By David Card
-
By James J. Heckman, Lance Lochner, ...
-
Life Cycle Schooling and Dynamic Selection Bias: Models and Evidence for Five Cohorts
-
By James J. Heckman and Edward Vytlacil
-
Earnings, Schooling, and Ability Revisited
By David Card