The Normative Analysis of 'Tagging' Revisited: Dealing with Stigmatization
Institut de Recherches Economiques et Sociales Working Paper No. 2003-30
29 Pages Posted: 25 Apr 2005 Last revised: 10 Apr 2015
Date Written: December 1, 2004
Abstract
Should income transfers be conditional upon personal characteristics of the potential recipients (the so-called "tagging") or should they only be tied to reported incomes? There is clear evidence that tagging and its assessment of the eligibility of applicants creates stigmatization. In this context, tagging is always suboptimal under a Maximin criterion. With a utilitarian criterion, tagging can only be recommended if the distribution of the intensity of stigmatization relative to earnings has small mean and variance and if the mean and variance of distribution of abilities among the high-ability people are neither too large nor too small.
Keywords: Tagging, optimal taxation, welfare programs, stigmatization
JEL Classification: H2, I3
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Register to save articles to
your library
Recommended Papers
-
The Effect of Marginal Tax Rates on Taxable Income: A Panel Study of The1986 Tax Reform Act
-
Tax Avoidance, Evasion, and Administration
By Joel B. Slemrod and Shlomo Yitzhaki
-
The Elasticity of Taxable Income: Evidence and Implications
By Jonathan Gruber and Emmanuel Saez
-
What Happens When You Tax the Rich? Evidence from Executive Compensation
-
A New Method of Estimating Risk Aversion
By Raj Chetty
-
Reported Incomes and Marginal Tax Rates, 1960-2000: Evidence and Policy Implications
-
Are "Real" Responses to Taxes Simply Income Shifting between Corporate and Personal Tax Bases?
By Roger H. Gordon and Joel B. Slemrod
