Bankruptcy Court Jurisdiction and Agency Action: Resolving the NextWave of Conflict

27 Pages Posted: 26 Apr 2005 Last revised: 5 May 2021

See all articles by Rafael I. Pardo

Rafael I. Pardo

Washington University in St. Louis - School of Law

Abstract

This Comment criticizes a pair of decisions by the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, FCC v. NextWave Personal Communications, Inc. (In re NextWave Personal Communications, Inc.) and In re FCC, which held that a bankruptcy court lacks jurisdiction to determine whether the Federal Communications Commission is stayed from revoking a debtor's licenses. The Comment argues that the Second Circuit interpreted the bankruptcy court's jurisdiction too narrowly because it failed to distinguish properly between an agency's action as a creditor and as a regulator. It concludes that bankruptcy courts and courts of appeals have concurrent jurisdiction to make automatic stay determinations regarding FCC licenses and that, for reasons of institutional competence, courts of appeals should defer to this exercise of jurisdiction by bankruptcy courts.

Keywords: bankruptcy, jurisdiction, automatic stay, property of the estate, government creditor, FCC

Suggested Citation

Pardo, Rafael I., Bankruptcy Court Jurisdiction and Agency Action: Resolving the NextWave of Conflict. New York University Law Review, Vol. 76, No. 3, 2001, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=709627

Rafael I. Pardo (Contact Author)

Washington University in St. Louis - School of Law ( email )

Anheuser-Busch Hall 585
1 Brookings Drive, Campus Box 1120
St. Louis, MO 63130
United States

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
95
Abstract Views
1,524
Rank
466,800
PlumX Metrics