Nutrition Labeling in the Food-Away-From-Home Sector: An Economic Assessment
28 Pages Posted: 4 May 2005
Date Written: April 2005
Abstract
Americans spent about 46 percent of their total food budget on food-away-from-home in 2002, up from 27 percent in 1962. Such foods tend to be less nutritious and higher in calories than foods prepared at home, and some studies have linked eating away from home to overweight and obesity in adults and children. Current nutrition labeling law exempts much of the food-away-from-home sector from mandatory labeling regulations. Because consumers are less likely to be aware of the ingredients and nutrient content of away-from-home food than of foods prepared at home, public health advocates have called for mandatory nutrition labeling for major sources of food-away-from-home, such as fast-food and chain restaurants. This report provides an economic assessment of a food-away-from-home nutrition labeling policy, including justifications for policy intervention and potential costs and benefits of the policy.
Keywords: Diet quality, food labeling, government regulation, health, mandatory
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
Labor Supply Response to the Earned Income Tax Credit
By Nada Eissa and Jeffrey B. Liebman
-
Welfare, the Earned Income Tax Credit, and the Labor Supply of Single Mothers
By Bruce D. Meyer and Dan T. Rosenbaum
-
By V. Joseph Hotz and John Karl Scholz
-
The Earned Income Tax Credit and the Labor Supply of Married Couples
-
Financial Incentives for Increasing Work and Income Among Low-Income Families
By Rebecca M. Blank, David Card, ...
-
Making Single Mothers Work: Recent Tax and Welfare Policy and its Effects
By Bruce D. Meyer and Dan T. Rosenbaum