Price Effects of Non-Traditionally Broker-Marketed Properties

Posted: 3 May 2005

See all articles by Ken Johnson

Ken Johnson

Auburn University Montgomery

Thomas M. Springer

Florida Atlantic University - Department of Finance & Real Estate

Abstract

This study investigates whether or not non-traditional marketing has an affect on the prices paid for residential real estate. Non-traditionally broker-marketed properties are defined as those properties that are sold with the aid of a real estate broker, but not marketed through a Multiple Listing Service (MLS). An analysis of properties that sold in this fashion offers further insight into the intermediation role of the real estate broker, as well as an opportunity to further investigate the efficiency of residential real estate markets. Specifically, we can assess whether MLS participation generates higher prices by determining whether like-kind properties price equivalently despite differences in their mode of marketing. The results show a significant and positive impact by non-traditionally broker-marketed properties on property price suggesting, for this sample, a premium of over 6% compared to like-kind properties marketed through the MLS. This premium may be a result of brokers intermediating a better matching of buyers and sellers. The observed premium also suggests a degree of market inefficiency.

Keywords: Market efficiency, intermediation, principal-agent, residential brokerage

Suggested Citation

Johnson, Ken and Springer, Thomas M., Price Effects of Non-Traditionally Broker-Marketed Properties. Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, Vol. 31, No. 3, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=715081

Ken Johnson (Contact Author)

Auburn University Montgomery ( email )

Montgomery, AL
United States

Thomas M. Springer

Florida Atlantic University - Department of Finance & Real Estate ( email )

5353 Parkside Drive
Jupiter, FL 33458
United States
561-297-2914 (Phone)
561-297-3686 (Fax)

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
710
PlumX Metrics