On Watson's Non-Forcing Contracts and Renegotiation
Brown University Economics Working Paper No. 2004-03
9 Pages Posted: 18 May 2005
Date Written: May 2004
Abstract
Watson (2002) proposes non-forcing contracts as a way to show the limitations of the mechanism design program with ex-post renegotiation (Maskin and Moore (1999)). If one takes a partial implementation approach, as Watson does, we show that non-forcing contracts do not constitute an intermediate paradigm between implementation with no renegotiation and with ex-post renegotiation. Moreover, taking a full implementation approach, non-forcing contracts fail if and only if one goes outside of the constraints identified by Maskin and Moore, because of the appearance of undesirable equilibria.
Keywords: contracts, renegotiation, mechanism design
JEL Classification: C70, D74, K10
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
Courts of Law and Unforeseen Contingencies
By Luca Anderlini, Leonardo Felli, ...
-
The Law and Economics of Costly Contracting
By Alan Schwartz and Joel Watson
-
Courts of Law and Unforeseen Contingencies
By Luca Anderlini, Leonardo Felli, ...
-
Courts of Law and Unforeseen Contingencies (Second Version)
By Leonardo Felli, Luca Anderlini, ...
-
Contract, Mechanism Design, and Technological Detail
By Joel Watson
-
Should Courts Always Enforce What Contracting Parties Write?
By Luca Anderlini, Leonardo Felli, ...
-
Should Courts Always Enforce What Contracting Parties Write?
By Luca Anderlini, Leonardo Felli, ...