Amended Final-Offer Arbitration is Improved Arbitration: Evidence from the Laboratory
21 Pages Posted: 20 May 2005
Date Written: 2005
Abstract
Arbitration is frequently utilized to settle disputes. Much research has focused on the properties of final-offer arbitration (FOA) relative to conventional arbitration. Both mechanisms should encourage settlement in standard environments, but previous empirical work finds that impasses remain common. A modification of FOA, amended final-offer arbitration (AFOA), has been proposed as an alternative mechanism. This paper compares the theoretical and behavioral properties of AFOA and FOA. Controlled laboratory experiments indicate that AFOA significantly outperforms FOA, generating substantially greater pre-arbitration settlement. Consistent with the theoretical predictions, offers converge under AFOA; however, FOA offers neither converge nor are consistent with theoretical predictions.
Keywords: Arbitration, Bargaining, Experiments
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
Litigation and Settlement: New Evidence from Labor Courts in Mexico
By David S. Kaplan, Joyce Sadka, ...
-
The Causes of Bargaining Failure: Evidence from Major League Baseball
By Amy Farmer, Paul Pecorino, ...
-
Enforceability of Labor Law: Evidence from a Labor Court in Mexico
By Joyce Sadka and David S. Kaplan
-
Arbitration and Bargaining Across the Pacific
By Cary A. Deck
-
Private Information, Self-Serving Biases, and Optimal Settlement Mechanisms: Theory and Evidence
By Seth A. Seabury and Eric L. Talley
-
Unemployment in Mexico: Policy Options, Unemployment Insurance and a Comparison with EPL Rules
-
How Did Workers Fare in Labor Mediation – An Empirical Assessment from Taiwan
By Kuo‐chang Huang, Kong-pin Chen, ...
-
When is Bargaining Successful? Negotiated Division of Tournament Prizes
By David Goldreich and Lukasz Pomorski