Posted: 3 Jul 1998
Date Written: February 1996
Fama and French (1992) document a significant relation between firm size, book-to-market ratios, and security returns for nonfinancial firms. Because of their initial interest in leverage as an explanatory variable for security returns, Fama and French exclude from their analysis financial firms, thus creating a natural holdout sample on which to test the robustness of their results. We document that the relation between firm size, book-to-market ratios, and security returns are similar for financial and nonfinancial firms. In addition, we present evidence that survivorship bias does not significantly affect the estimated size or book-to-market premiums in returns. Our results indicate data-snooping and selection biases do not explain the size and book-to-market patterns in returns.
JEL Classification: G12, G14
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Barber, Brad M. and Lyon, John D., Firm Size, Book-to-Market Ratio, and Security Returns: A Holdout Sample of Financial Firms (February 1996). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=7282