The Federalist Dimension of Regulatory Takings Jurisprudence

70 Pages Posted: 8 Jun 2005

See all articles by Stewart E. Sterk

Stewart E. Sterk

Yeshiva University - Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law


Conventional wisdom teaches that the Supreme Court's takings doctrine is a muddle. Appearances, however, are deceiving. The "property" protected by the Takings Clause is defined not by a single sovereign, but by the legislative enactments and judicial pronouncements of fifty separate states. As a result, federalism concerns - underappreciated in the takings literature - do and should play an important role in shaping the Court's takings doctrine. In particular, these concerns make it inappropriate for the Court to use the Takings Clause as a vehicle for articulating a comprehensive theory of the limits on government power to regulate land. This Article focuses on the ways in which federalism concerns (together with related institutional concerns) shape takings jurisprudence.

Keywords: land use planning, takings clause, eminent domain, just compensation, zoning

Suggested Citation

Sterk, Stewart E., The Federalist Dimension of Regulatory Takings Jurisprudence. Cardozo Legal Studies Research Paper No. 121, Available at SSRN:

Stewart E. Sterk (Contact Author)

Yeshiva University - Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law ( email )

55 Fifth Ave.
New York, NY 10003
United States
212-790-0230 (Phone)
212-790-0205 (Fax)

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
PlumX Metrics