Beyond Publius: Montesquieu, Liberal Republicanism, and the Small-Republic Thesis

History of Political Thought, 2006

58 Pages Posted: 9 Jun 2005

See all articles by Jacob T. Levy

Jacob T. Levy

McGill University - Department of Political Science


The thesis that republicanism was only suited for small states was given its decisive eighteenth-century formulation by Montesquieu, who emphasized not only republics' need for homogeneity and virtue but also the difficulty of constraining military and executive power in large republics. Hume and Publius famously replaced small republics' virtue and homogeneity with large republics' plurality of contending factions. Even those who shared this turn to modern liberty, commerce, and the accompanying heterogeneity of interests, however, did not all agree with or know about Publius' institutional responses to the problems of executive and military power. Throughout the late eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries, and on both sides of the Atlantic, it remained a live question whether large states could be stable moderate republics, with responses ranging from embraces of Montesquieuian limited monarchy, to denials that there was any real large-republic problem at all, with a variety of institutional solutions in between for those who thought there was a real but soluble large-republic problem.

Keywords: Montesquieu, Federalist Papers, Madison, Bnejamin Constant, Destutt de Tracy, federalism, republicanism, eighteenth century political thought, liberalism

Suggested Citation

Levy, Jacob T., Beyond Publius: Montesquieu, Liberal Republicanism, and the Small-Republic Thesis. History of Political Thought, 2006. Available at SSRN:

Jacob T. Levy (Contact Author)

McGill University - Department of Political Science ( email )

Montreal, Quebec H3A 1G5

Here is the Coronavirus
related research on SSRN

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
PlumX Metrics