Corporate Governance and Bank Performance: A Joint Analysis of the Static, Selection, and Dynamic Effects of Domestic, Foreign, and State Ownership
43 Pages Posted: 22 Jul 2005
Date Written: June 2005
Abstract
We jointly analyze the static, selection, and dynamic effects of domestic, foreign, and state ownership on bank performance. We argue that it is important to include indicators of all the relevant governance effects in the same model. "Nonrobustness" checks (which purposely exclude some indicators) support this argument. Using data from Argentina in the 1990s, our strongest and most robust results concern state ownership. State-owned banks have poor long-term performance (static effect), those undergoing privatization had particularly poor performance beforehand (selection effect), and these banks dramatically improved following privatization (dynamic effect). However, much of the measured improvement is likely due to placing nonperforming loans into residual entities, leaving "good" privatized banks.
Keywords: Bank, governance, M&A, foreign acquisition, privatization
JEL Classification: G21, G28, G34, F36
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
Bank Performance, Efficiency and Ownership in Transitition Countries
By John Bonin, Paul Wachtel, ...
-
Bank Ownership and Performance
By Alejandro Micco, Ugo Panizza, ...
-
By David Grigorian and Vlad Manole
-
Why Privatize? The Case of Argentina's Public Provincial Banks
By Robert Cull and George R. G. Clarke
-
Privatization Matters: Bank Efficiency in Transition Countries
By John Bonin, Paul Wachtel, ...
-
Privatization Matters: Bank Efficiency in Transition Countries
By John Bonin, Paul Wachtel, ...
-
Privatization Matters: Bank Efficiency in Transition Countries
By John Bonin, Iftekhar Hasan, ...
-
Bank Ownership and Efficiency in China: What Will Happen in the World's Largest Nation?
By Allen N. Berger, Iftekhar Hasan, ...