Targeted Killing as Active Self-Defense
Case Legal Studies Research Paper Forthcoming
Case Western Researh Journal Int'l Law, Vol. 36, p. 319, 2004
16 Pages Posted: 12 Jul 2005 Last revised: 6 Feb 2013
Date Written: June 29, 2010
Abstract
The paper argues that targeted killing is a legitimate form of active self-defense in the context of anticipatory self-defense. If the decision to target a particular individual is based on reliable and corroborated intelligence information and on the premise that no alternatives exist (the individual for operational reasons may not be arrested) and the individual to be targeted is a significant terrorist whose death will impact upon the terrorist organization then the decision is legal. In addition, the article calls for a revamping of international law reflecting the reality that traditional warfare between states has been replaced by armed conflict between states and non-state actors, some state supported, others not.
Keywords: Terrorism, Targeted Killing, Right to Active Self-Defense, Palestinian, Israel
JEL Classification: K19, K33, K49
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
Colombia's Incursion into Ecuadorian Territory: Justified Hot Pursuit or Pugnacious Error?
-
Legality vs. Legitimacy: Can Uses of Force be Illegal but Justified?
-
The Armed Activities Case and Non-State Actors in Self-Defence Law
-
Use of Armed Force Against Terrorists in Afghanistan, Iraq, and Beyond
-
Colombia’s Incursion into Ecuadorian Territory: Justified Hot Pursuit or Pugnacious Error?