Private Property Rights and the Environment after Palazzolo

66 Pages Posted: 27 Jul 2005


With the ascendancy of environmentalism in American law has come a renewed focus on private property rights. That in turn has rekindled the debate over whether our ability to use private property is a fundamental right rather than an essentially revocable right that derives from the government. This debate was recently played out in Palazzolo v. Rhode Island where the United States Supreme Court addressed several elements of regulatory takings doctrine: When is a claim against government ripe? Does an acquirer of already regulated property have the same rights to challenge the regulation and bring a takings claims as the owner at the time the regulations were adopted? Whether there can be a regulatory taking if some use and value remains in the property, albeit a greatly diminished use and value, or if use and value is diminished on only a portion of a property.

This Article focuses on these questions in light of the Supreme Court's holdings in Palazzolo, as potentially modified in Tahoe-Sierra Preservation Council, Inc. v. Tahoe Regional Planning Agency. Attention will be focused on the role that environmental protection concerns play in determining whether a regulation constitutes a regulatory taking, including a discussion of wetlands and the public trust doctrine.

Keywords: Palazzolo, private property rights, environmentalism, regulatory taking, ripeness

JEL Classification: K11

Suggested Citation

Burling, James S., Private Property Rights and the Environment after Palazzolo. Boston College Environmental Affairs Law Review, Vol. 30, No. 1, 2002, Available at SSRN:

James S. Burling (Contact Author)

Pacific Legal Foundation ( email )

907 G. Street
Sacramento, CA 95814
United States
916-419-7111 (Phone)
916-419-7747 (Fax)


Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
PlumX Metrics