11 Pages Posted: 27 Jul 2005
Empirical data show that, despite the significant electoral success of state court judges, elections still impact judicial decision-making, and elected judges are less consistent in their voting patterns than appointed judges. In addition, if interest in state judicial elections continues to wane and these contests are not robust, states no longer even benefits from the participatory advantages of an elective system. Using the State of Wisconsin as an example, this Article suggests that Wisconsin and other state legislatures, with the support of bar associations and academics, should revisit the historical underpinnings of judicial elections, and consider both whether electing judges conforms with the historical goals of having an elected judiciary and whether the available empirical data support the belief that elected judges can be systematically consistent and independent in the decision-making process.
Keywords: Courts, judges, judicial selection, election, voting
JEL Classification: K4
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Czarnezki, Jason J., A Call for Change: Improving Judicial Selection Methods. Marquette Law Review, Vol. 89, 2005; Marquette University Legal Studies Paper No. 06-14. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=759947