A Call for Change: Improving Judicial Selection Methods

11 Pages Posted: 27 Jul 2005


Empirical data show that, despite the significant electoral success of state court judges, elections still impact judicial decision-making, and elected judges are less consistent in their voting patterns than appointed judges. In addition, if interest in state judicial elections continues to wane and these contests are not robust, states no longer even benefits from the participatory advantages of an elective system. Using the State of Wisconsin as an example, this Article suggests that Wisconsin and other state legislatures, with the support of bar associations and academics, should revisit the historical underpinnings of judicial elections, and consider both whether electing judges conforms with the historical goals of having an elected judiciary and whether the available empirical data support the belief that elected judges can be systematically consistent and independent in the decision-making process.

Keywords: Courts, judges, judicial selection, election, voting

JEL Classification: K4

Suggested Citation

Czarnezki, Jason J., A Call for Change: Improving Judicial Selection Methods. Marquette Law Review, Vol. 89, 2005, Marquette University Legal Studies Paper No. 06-14, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=759947

Jason J. Czarnezki (Contact Author)

Pace University - School of Law ( email )

78 North Broadway
White Plains, NY 10603
United States

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
PlumX Metrics