Ameliorating Conflicts of Interest in Auditing: Effects of Recent Reforms on Auditors and Their Clients

35 Pages Posted: 28 Jul 2005

See all articles by Mark W. Nelson

Mark W. Nelson

Cornell University - Samuel Curtis Johnson Graduate School of Management

Date Written: July 11, 2005

Abstract

Moore, Tetlock, Tanlu and Bazerman ("MTTB") write that "moral-seduction theory" predicts that auditor decisions are affected by economic and social pressures in ways that affect audit quality, and that "issue-cycle theory" predicts that efforts to reform the audit industry will be undermined by special interests. MTTB therefore conclude that recent reform efforts are misguided and insufficient, because the reforms do not resolve underlying conflicts of interest. I agree with MTTB's basic premise that economic and social incentives affect behavior, but I do not agree with their characterization of many recent reforms. MTTB misstate some reforms, and do not consider sufficiently how reforms reduce the likelihood of audit failure by affecting the actions of audit clients as well as auditors. I conclude that the evidence does not clearly indicate need for further reform, and that further research is necessary to understand the effects (both intended and unintended) of recent reforms.

Keywords: auditing, independence, sarbanes-oxley, reform, motivated reasoning

JEL Classification: M49, M41, D74, K20

Suggested Citation

Nelson, Mark W., Ameliorating Conflicts of Interest in Auditing: Effects of Recent Reforms on Auditors and Their Clients (July 11, 2005). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=760844 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.760844

Mark W. Nelson (Contact Author)

Cornell University - Samuel Curtis Johnson Graduate School of Management ( email )

448 Sage Hall
Ithaca, NY 14853
United States
607-255-6323 (Phone)
607-254-4590 (Fax)

Here is the Coronavirus
related research on SSRN

Paper statistics

Downloads
708
Abstract Views
3,538
rank
36,731
PlumX Metrics