33 Pages Posted: 31 Jul 2005
Date Written: June 2005
We propose and test a new survey methodology to assess the public's criminal justice spending priorities. Respondents are explicitly forced to trade-off one type of crime prevention or control policy for another and to consider the fact that any money spent on crime prevention or control policies is money they could otherwise have in their pockets. Thus, respondents are asked to allocate a fixed budget into five categories - more prisons, police, youth prevention programs, drug treatment for nonviolent offenders, and a tax rebate to citizens. In a nationally representative sample, we found overwhelming public support for more money being devoted to youth prevention, drug treatment for nonviolent offenders, and more police. However, the median respondent would not allocate any new money to building more prisons and would not avail him or herself of a tax rebate if the money were spent on youth prevention, drug treatment and police. At the margin, we estimate the public would receive $3.07 in perceived value by spending $1.00 of their tax dollars on youth prevention; $1.86 in value for every dollar spent on drug treatment; and $1.76 in value for a dollar spent on police. However, the public would clearly not spend more on prisons at the margin, deriving only 71 cents in value for every dollar spent.
Keywords: Crime prevention, public policy, survey methodology, willingness-to-pay
JEL Classification: K00, K14, H50
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Cohen, Mark A. and Rust, Roland T. and Steen, Sara, Prevention, Crime Control or Cash? Public Preferences Towards Criminal Justice Spending Priorities (June 2005). Robert H. Smith School Research Paper No. RHS 06-048. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=762626 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.762626