Are People Inequality-Averse, or Just Risk-Averse?
22 Pages Posted: 25 Jul 2005
Abstract
Individuals' preferences for risk and inequality are measured through choices between imagined societies and lotteries. The median relative risk aversion, which is often seen to reflect social inequality aversion, is between 2 and 3. Most people are also found to be individually inequality-averse, reflecting a willingness to pay for living in a more equal society. Left-wing voters and women are both more risk and inequality-averse than others. The model allows for non-monotonic SWFs, implying that welfare may decrease with an individual's income at high-income levels, which is illustrated in simulations based on the empirical results.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
Inequality Aversion Versus Risk Aversion
By Yoram Kroll and Liema Davidovitz
-
Risk and Inequality Perceptions
By Yoram Amiel and Frank Cowell
-
Inequality, Welfare and Monotonicity
By Yoram Amiel and Frank Cowell
-
Evaluation Via Extended Orderings: Empirical Findings from West and East
By Wulf Gaertner and Jochen Jungeilges
-
Social vs. Risk Preferences under the Veil of Ignorance
By Nicola Frignani and Giovanni Ponti
-
Perceptions of Risk: An Experimental Approach Using Internet Questionnaires
By Frank Cowell
-
Preference Reversals and the Analysis of Income Distributions
By Yoram Amiel, Frank Cowell, ...
-
Selfishness and Altruism in the Distribution of Travel Time and Income