Download this Paper Open PDF in Browser

Why Antitrust Should Defer to the Intellectual Property Rules of Standard-Setting Organizations: A Commentary on Teece & Sherry

20 Pages Posted: 5 Aug 2005  

Michael A. Carrier

Rutgers Law School

Abstract

This essay addresses the intellectual property rules of standard setting organizations (SSOs). Because owners may refuse to license intellectual property (IP) that is essential to the implementation of standards, many SSOs have adopted search, disclosure, and licensing rules that restrict their members' use of IP.

In the essay, I agree with the limited antitrust scrutiny of SSOs' IP rules envisioned by David Teece and Edward Sherry. But I arrive at that result not from a one-size-fits-all characterization of antitrust or an emphasis on the delay resulting from applying the discipline. Rather, I focus on the rationales underlying antitrust jurisprudence.

In particular, I emphasize the lack of significant anticompetitive effects from the IP rules of SSOs: the organizations do not resemble the collusive cartel-type arrangements that historically have drawn antitrust scrutiny, and membership in the SSO is typically not necessary to practice the standard or to exclude members from access to essential patented inputs. This lack of significant anticompetitive effects is accompanied by powerful procompetitive justifications for the rules, which reduce the likelihood that patentees will hold up the implementation of the standard.

Keywords: antitrust, intellectual property, standards, standard-setting organizations

JEL Classification: K21,L41,O31,O34

Suggested Citation

Carrier, Michael A., Why Antitrust Should Defer to the Intellectual Property Rules of Standard-Setting Organizations: A Commentary on Teece & Sherry. Minnesota Law Review, Vol. 87, p. 2019, 2003. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=766504

Michael Carrier (Contact Author)

Rutgers Law School ( email )

217 North Fifth Street
Camden, NJ 08102-1203
United States
856-225-6380 (Phone)
856-225-6516 (Fax)

Paper statistics

Downloads
337
Rank
75,395
Abstract Views
3,013