Citations (2)



The Limits of Lawyering: Legal Opinions in Structured Finance

Steven L. Schwarcz

Duke University School of Law

Texas Law Review, Vol. 84, Fall 2005
Duke Law School Legal Studies Paper No. 69

Significant controversy surrounds the issuance of legal opinions in structured finance transactions, particularly where accountants separately use these opinions, beyond their traditional primary use, for determining whether to characterize the transactions as debt. Reflecting at its core the unresolved boundaries between public and private in financial transactions, this controversy raises important issues of first impression: To what extent, for example, should lawyers be able to issue legal opinions that create negative externalities? Furthermore, what should differentiate the roles of lawyers and accountants in disclosing information to investors? Resolution of these issues not only helps to demystify the mystique, and untangle the morass, of legal-opinion giving but also affects the very viability of the securitization industry, which dominates American, and increasingly global, financing.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 58

Keywords: structured finance transactions, accountants, investors

JEL Classification: M41, M45, G32, G38, K22

Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: August 3, 2005 ; Last revised: November 11, 2009

Suggested Citation

Schwarcz, Steven L., The Limits of Lawyering: Legal Opinions in Structured Finance. Texas Law Review, Vol. 84, Fall 2005; Duke Law School Legal Studies Paper No. 69. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=774350

Contact Information

Steven L. Schwarcz (Contact Author)
Duke University School of Law ( email )
210 Science Drive
Box 90362
Durham, NC 27708
United States
919-613-7060 (Phone)
919-613-7231 (Fax)

Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 2,451
Downloads: 544
Download Rank: 15,983
Citations:  2
People who downloaded this paper also downloaded:
1. Securitization, Structured Finance, and Covered Bonds
By Steven Schwarcz