Credit Ratings and the Standardised Approach to Credit Risk in Basel Ii
56 Pages Posted: 16 Sep 2005
Date Written: August 2005
Abstract
This paper simulates the minimum capital requirements for the wholesale exposures of a medium-sized bank in each EMU country depending on the credit rating agencies chosen by the bank to risk-weight its exposures in the standardised approach to credit risk in Basel II. Three main results emerge from the analysis. First, although the use of different combinations of credit rating agencies leads to significant differences in minimum capital requirements, these differences never exceed 10% of EMU banks' regulatory capital for wholesale exposures on average. Second, the standardised approach provides a small regulatory capital incentive for banks to use several credit rating agencies to risk-weight their exposures. Third, the minimum capital requirements for the wholesale exposures of EMU banks will be higher in Basel II than in Basel I. I also show that the incentive for banks to engage in regulatory arbitrage in the standardised approach to credit risk is limited.
Keywords: New Basel Capital Accord, capital requirements, credit rating agencies
JEL Classification: G21, G28
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
Stock Market Reaction to Anticipated versus Surprise Rating Changes
-
Moody's and S&P Ratings: Are They Equivalent? Conservative Ratings and Split Rated Bond Yields
By Miles Livingston, Jie (diana) Wei, ...
-
Credit Ratings and the Standardized Approach to Credit Risk in Basel Ii
-
The Adjustment of Credit Ratings in Advance of Defaults
By Andre Guettler and Mark Wahrenburg
-
When You Wish Upon a Star: Explaining the Cautious Growth of Royalty-Backed Securitization
-
A New Method to Value Intellectual Property
By Ted Hagelin
-
Multimarket Trading and the Cost of Debt: Evidence from Global Bonds
-
Resolving the Patent-Antitrust Paradox Through Tripartite Innovation