Abstract

https://ssrn.com/abstract=782464
 


 



Blameworthiness, Intent and Cultural Dissonance: The Unequal Treatment of Cultural Defense Defendants


Nancy S. Kim


California Western School of Law


Florida Journal Law & Public Policy, Vol. 17, p. 199, 2006

Abstract:     
Criminal law assumes that the judge and jury share the same cultural and experiential framework as the defendant; accordingly, crimes are defined with this assumption as an underlying premise. In this article, I will explain how the determination of mens rea often fails to reflect culpability because the definition of crimes fail to account for the cultural dissonance that often exists between the judge/juror and the accused. In this Article, I propose an analysis and reconceptualization of intent that bridges gaps in perception and understanding attributable to cultural dissonance.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 32


Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: August 18, 2005 ; Last revised: November 6, 2015

Suggested Citation

Kim, Nancy S., Blameworthiness, Intent and Cultural Dissonance: The Unequal Treatment of Cultural Defense Defendants. Florida Journal Law & Public Policy, Vol. 17, p. 199, 2006. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=782464

Contact Information

Nancy S. Kim (Contact Author)
California Western School of Law ( email )
225 Cedar Street
San Diego, CA 92101
United States

Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,233
Downloads: 123
Download Rank: 177,503