Download this Paper Open PDF in Browser

Fast Food Justice

11 Pages Posted: 24 Aug 2005  

Howard M. Wasserman

Florida International University (FIU) - College of Law

Date Written: August 18, 2005

Abstract

This light essay introduces the new interdisciplinary field of Law and Fast Food. It examines several well-known legal disputes involving fast food and fast food establishments. The inspiration and starting point for the essay is the recent decision in Hedgepeth v. WMATA (D.C. Cir. 2004), in which Supreme Court nominee John Roberts wrote the opinion rejecting a constitutional challenge by a 12-year-old girl who was arrested for eating a french fry in a train station. I suggest that this case captures the essence of Law and Fast Food: serious legal and social issues lost in the cultural and media parody that is fast food. Other cases that are part of the canon include the McDonald's obesity litigation, the McDonald's coffee case, and the McLibel lawsuit in England.

Keywords: Libel, First Amendment, Supreme Court, Tort Reform

Suggested Citation

Wasserman, Howard M., Fast Food Justice (August 18, 2005). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=785866 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.785866

Howard M. Wasserman (Contact Author)

Florida International University (FIU) - College of Law ( email )

University Park, DB 2065
Miami, FL 33199
United States
305-348-7482 (Phone)

Paper statistics

Downloads
452
Rank
52,236
Abstract Views
4,639