Congress, the Courts, and New Technologies: A Response to Professor Solove

15 Pages Posted: 24 Aug 2005  

Orin S. Kerr

The George Washington University Law School

Abstract

Which branch of government should take the leading role in the creation of criminal procedure rules when technology is in flux? In a recent article, The Fourth Amendment and New Technologies: Constitutional Myths and the Case for Caution, 102 Michigan Law Review 801-888 (2004), Professor Kerr argued that Congress has a relative institutional advantage over the courts in the creation of rules regulating law enforcement investigations that involve new technologies. Professor Daniel Solove disputes that institutional advantage in a symposium essay, Fourth Amendment Codification and Professor Kerr's Misguided Call for Judicial Deference. In this brief response to Solove, Professor Kerr contends that Solove's critique misses the mark in two ways. First, Solove improperly compares a descriptive account of statutory law protections with a normative account of constitutional law protections. Second, Solove fails to appreciate fully the institutional limitations of judicial rulemaking when technology is changing rapidly.

Keywords: Fourth Amendment computers

JEL Classification: K14

Suggested Citation

Kerr, Orin S., Congress, the Courts, and New Technologies: A Response to Professor Solove. Fordham Law Review, Vol. 74, 2005; GWU Law School Public Law Research Paper No. 154. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=786286

Orin S. Kerr (Contact Author)

The George Washington University Law School ( email )

2000 H Street, N.W.
Washington, DC 20052
United States
202-994-4775 (Phone)
202-994-9817 (Fax)

HOME PAGE: http://www.law.gwu.edu/orin-s-kerr

Paper statistics

Downloads
226
Rank
110,026
Abstract Views
3,561