Hate Crime Law and the Limits of Inculpation

49 Pages Posted: 28 Aug 2005

See all articles by Janine Young Kim

Janine Young Kim

Chapman University, The Dale E. Fowler School of Law

Abstract

Critics sometimes maintain that hate crime law punishes an offender for her motive and character and is therefore doctrinally and morally illegitimate. This manuscript explores the concept of culpability to examine this challenge, and argues that critics inaccurately assume that our criminal law conditions culpability on a robust understanding of choice. This inaccuracy significantly undermines the doctrinal critique against hate crime law, which in fact appears to be consistent with many other laws that consider motive and character as relevant factors in determining degree of guilt and proportionate punishment. Notwithstanding the apparent doctrinal validity of hate crime law, the author questions whether enhanced punishment for racially motivated crimes is morally (and politically) defensible in light of our current theoretical and psychological understanding of race and racism.

Keywords: Culpability, hate crime law, critical race theory

Suggested Citation

Kim, Janine Young, Hate Crime Law and the Limits of Inculpation. Nebraska Law Review, Vol. 84, 2006, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=786746

Janine Young Kim (Contact Author)

Chapman University, The Dale E. Fowler School of Law ( email )

One University Drive
Orange, CA 92866-1099
United States

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
260
Abstract Views
2,257
rank
145,023
PlumX Metrics