Domesticating the Gerrymander: An Essay on Standards, Fair Representation, and the Necessary Question of Judicial Will

21 Pages Posted: 25 Aug 2005 Last revised: 14 Jun 2013

Luis E. Fuentes-Rohwer

Indiana University Maurer School of Law

Abstract

The U.S. Supreme Court has moved beyond its cautious intervention in Baker v. Carr and now firmly controls the law of democracy. Yet political gerrymandering questions so understood have traditionally proven difficult for the Court to examine properly. The recent Vieth v. Jubelirer is but a further example of this phenomenon. This Essay situates Vieth within the reapportionment revolution and ultimately concludes that the central question in gerrymandering cases is the question of judicial will and whether the Court will choose to exercise its power. This Essay closes with a cautionary note: in light of the Court's general performance in the field of democracy and its propensity to wield its power in accordance with its idiosyncratic views of the political process and the maladies that corrupt it, do we really want the Court doing our bidding?

Keywords: law of democracy, gerrymandering, political questions, judicial review

Suggested Citation

Fuentes-Rohwer, Luis E., Domesticating the Gerrymander: An Essay on Standards, Fair Representation, and the Necessary Question of Judicial Will. 14 Cornell J.L. & Pub. Pol’y 423 (2005); IU Law-Bloomington Research Paper No. 39. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=787764

Luis E. Fuentes-Rohwer (Contact Author)

Indiana University Maurer School of Law ( email )

211 S. Indiana Avenue
Bloomington, IN 47405
United States
812-855-5003 (Phone)
812-855-0555 (Fax)

Paper statistics

Downloads
76
Rank
260,193
Abstract Views
1,283