Federalism, Consumer Protection and Preemption: A Case for Heightened Judicial Review

35 Pages Posted: 7 Sep 2005

See all articles by Vincent DiLorenzo

Vincent DiLorenzo

St. John's University - School of Law

Date Written: September 2005

Abstract

Should courts defer to the preemption decisions of federal agencies? The Supreme Court has not settled the controversy generated by this issue, and Circuit Courts have divided on the question. The focus in past case law and in the literature has been on agency versus judicial expertise. This article examines another aspect of the question - agency bias. It presents a case study of the actions of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) in the 1992-2005 period and compares that agency's stance to that of the FDIC. The conclusion drawn is that the OCC has not served as an unbiased forum for resolving disputes over preemption. Instead it has exhibited an overly aggressive viewpoint - ignoring the evolution of Supreme Court doctrine, ignoring legislative history and embracing the interests of the banking industry while minimizing the interests of consumers and state governments. Heightened judicial review of agency decisions tainted by self-interest is necessary.

Suggested Citation

DiLorenzo, Vincent, Federalism, Consumer Protection and Preemption: A Case for Heightened Judicial Review (September 2005). St. John's Legal Studies Research Paper No. 09-0026, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=796147 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.796147

Vincent DiLorenzo (Contact Author)

St. John's University - School of Law ( email )

8000 Utopia Parkway
Jamaica, NY 11439
United States

Here is the Coronavirus
related research on SSRN

Paper statistics

Downloads
95
Abstract Views
1,031
rank
304,484
PlumX Metrics