Informed Trading, Investment, and Welfare

Posted: 8 Jan 1997

See all articles by James Dow

James Dow

London Business School - Institute of Finance and Accounting

Rohit Rahi

London School of Economics - Department of Finance; London School of Economics & Political Science (LSE) - Financial Markets Group

Date Written: October 1996

Abstract

This paper studies the welfare economics of informed trading in a stock market. We model the effect of more informative prices on investment, given that this dependence will itself be reflected in equilibrium prices. We show that in rational expectations equilibrium with price-taking competitive behavior, and in the presence of risk-neutral uninformed agents, uninformed traders cannot lose money on average to informed traders. However, some agents with superior information may be willing to lose money on average in order to improve their hedging possibilities. We provide a parametric model that allows a closed-form solution and a complete welfare analysis. While a higher incidence of informed speculation always increases firm value through a more informative trading process, the effect on agents' welfare depends on how revelation of information changes risk-sharing opportunities in the market.

JEL Classification: G10

Suggested Citation

Dow, James and Rahi, Rohit, Informed Trading, Investment, and Welfare (October 1996). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=8014

James Dow

London Business School - Institute of Finance and Accounting ( email )

Sussex Place
Regent's Park
London NW1 4SA
United Kingdom
+44 20 7262 5050 (Phone)
+44 20 7724 3317 (Fax)

Rohit Rahi (Contact Author)

London School of Economics - Department of Finance ( email )

Houghton Street
London, WC2A 2AE
United Kingdom
+44 20 7955 7313 (Phone)

HOME PAGE: http://https://sites.google.com/lse.ac.uk/rohit-rahi

London School of Economics & Political Science (LSE) - Financial Markets Group ( email )

Houghton Street
London WC2A 2AE
United Kingdom

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
975
PlumX Metrics