Judicial Approaches to Contested Causation: Fairchild V. Glenhaven Funeral Services in Context

Posted: 29 Feb 2008

Abstract

The decision of the House of Lords in Fairchild v. Glenhaven Funeral Services raises important questions about the compensation of employees for occupational injury. In Fairchild, the principal issue was whether an employee could recover where he could prove negligently inflicted injury, but, having worked for more than one employer, not the identity of the person who caused the injury. This article considers the issue in the wider context of judicial responses to uncertainty in personal injury litigation. It suggests that Fairchild raises issues which are little different from those in other personal injury cases where judges have been prepared to take a pragmatic approach to causation, in order to allow a deserving plaintiff to recover damages.

Suggested Citation

Miller, Chris, Judicial Approaches to Contested Causation: Fairchild V. Glenhaven Funeral Services in Context. Law, Probability and Risk, Vol. 1, pp. 119-139, December 2002 , Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=805042

Chris Miller (Contact Author)

University of Salford ( email )

United Kingdom

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
974
PlumX Metrics