Too Big to Fail after All These Years
30 Pages Posted: 4 Oct 2005
Date Written: September 2005
Abstract
The naming of eleven banks as "too big to fail (TBTF)" in 1984 led bond raters to raise their ratings on new bond issues of TBTF banks about a notch relative to those of other, unnamed banks. The relationship between bond spreads and ratings for the TBTF banks tended to flatten after that event, suggesting that investors were even more optimistic than raters about the probability of support for those banks. The spread-rating relationship in the 1990s remained flatter for TBTF banks (or their descendants) even after the passage of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Improvement Act of 1991 (FDICIA), suggesting that investors still see those banks as TBTF. Until investors are disabused of such beliefs, investor discipline of big banks will be less than complete.
Keywords: market discipline, too big to fail
JEL Classification: G2, G3, N2
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
Bank Risk of Failure and the Too-Big-To-Fail Policy
By Huberto M. Ennis and H. S. Malek
-
How Much Did Banks Pay to Become Too-Big-To-Fail and to Become Systemically Important?
By Elijah Brewer and Julapa Jagtiani
-
How Much Did Banks Pay to Become Too-Big-To-Fail and to Become Systemically Important?
By Elijah Brewer and Julapa Jagtiani
-
How Much Did Banks Pay to Become Too-Big-To-Fail and to Become Systemically Important?
By Julapa Jagtiani and Elijah Brewer
-
‘Too Systemically Important to Fail’ in Banking
By Philip Molyneux, Klaus Schaeck, ...
-
'Too-Big-To-Fail' and its Impact on Safety Net Subsidies and Systemic Risk
By Klaus Schaeck, Tim Mi Zhou, ...
-
How Much Would Banks Be Willing to Pay to Become 'Too-Big-to-Fail' and to Capture Other Benefits
By Elijah Brewer and Julapa Jagtiani