Longitudinal Value Relevance of Earnings and Intangible Assets: Evidence from Australian Firms

Posted: 10 Nov 2005

See all articles by John Goodwin

John Goodwin

Corvinus University

Kamran Ahmed

La Trobe Business School, La Trobe University

Abstract

Recent U.S. studies report earnings value relevance has declined over time. Some authors suggest non-recognition of intangible assets in the U.S. is a major reason for declining earnings value relevance. However, the evidence is mixed on the effect of non-recognition of intangible assets. To examine this conjecture, this paper examines earnings value relevance for Australian firms since Australian GAAP has not prohibited intangible asset recognition. Using a variety of established models and specifications, our results indicate that for the average firm, there is weak evidence of decline in earnings value relevance. However, firms that capitalize intangibles have increasing earnings value relevance. Further, the magnitude of the difference in earnings value relevance between capitalizing firms and non-capitalizing firms is most pronounced in the latter part of the 1990s and this difference is increasing.

Keywords: Longitudinal earnings value relevance, Intangible assets, Australian GAAP

JEL Classification: M41

Suggested Citation

Goodwin, John and Ahmed, Kamran, Longitudinal Value Relevance of Earnings and Intangible Assets: Evidence from Australian Firms. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, Forthcoming, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=820584

John Goodwin (Contact Author)

Corvinus University ( email )

Fővám tér 8
Budapest, 1054
Hungary

Kamran Ahmed

La Trobe Business School, La Trobe University ( email )

Kingsbury Drive
Melbourne, VIC 3086
Australia
0403038387 (Phone)
3105 (Fax)

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
1,174
PlumX Metrics